کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2072615 1544710 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Influence of semen collection method on sperm cryoresistance in small ruminants
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تأثیر روش جمع آوری مایع منی بر روی مقاومت به انسداد اسپرم در نشخوارکنندگان کوچک
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
چکیده انگلیسی


• The effect of collection method (artificial vagina vs. electroejaculation) on sperm quality was studied in ovine and caprine.
• The volume and concentration of ejaculate were the only parameters modified by collection method for both species.
• After thawing sperm quality in ram was similar between collection methods.
• After thawing sperm quality in bucks was better when semen was collected by artificial vagina.

Semen collection for cryopreservation is a key step for small ruminant conservation programs. While in these species semen is mainly collected via artificial vagina (AV), electroejaculation (EE) provides a viable alternative for untrained males. Herein we investigated the effect of semen collection method on post-thaw sperm quality by comparing two small ruminant species, sheep and goats. Semen from Blanca-Celtibérica bucks and Manchega rams was collected by AV and EE on the same day and cryopreserved using a standard protocol. At thawing, sperm motion parameters were evaluated by CASA, whereas membrane stability (YO-PRO-1), sperm viability (propidium iodide, PI) and mitochondrial activity (Mitotracker Deep Red) were analyzed using flow cytometry. The semen collection method negatively affected post-thaw sperm quality in bucks but not in rams. Thus, in bucks, post-thaw sperm motility was higher for samples collected by AV as compared to those obtained via EE. Similarly, post-thaw sperm parameters evaluated by flow cytometry were worse for buck samples collected by EE than those collected by AV in the same species, or than ram samples regardless of collection method. These results suggest that ovine and caprine spermatozoa have a different response to the cryopreservation process depending upon the semen collection method used. We hypothesize that the EE procedure may lead to changes in the composition of the ejaculate in bucks that would make spermatozoa more susceptible to the cryopreservation process, whereas this procedure would have had no effect on ram spermatozoa. This assumption requires further investigation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Animal Reproduction Science - Volume 167, April 2016, Pages 103–108
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,