کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2735663 1404104 2016 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Is magnetic resonance imaging a viable alternative to ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in the diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis? A systematic review
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
آیا تصویربرداری رزونانس مغناطیسی یک جایگزین مناسب به عنوان روش تصویربرداری اولیه در تشخیص آپاندیسیت در کودکان سونوگرافی است؟ یک مرور نظام
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی رادیولوژی و تصویربرداری
چکیده انگلیسی


• MRI may be used as the primary imaging tool to investigate paediatric appendicitis.
• Gadolinium is not necessary for MRI evaluation of appendicitis in children.
• Sedation for MRI evaluation of appendicitis is not required routinely in children.
• A focussed sequence pathway for adoption and validation in practice is provided.

BackgroundAppendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention in paediatric patients. Ultrasound is generally the diagnostic imaging modality of choice, followed by CT, where paediatric appendicitis is suspected. However, high operator dependency and diagnostic restrictions related to anatomical and clinical presentation may limit consistency of application. This paper explores whether MRI is a viable alternative to ultrasound as the primary imaging modality.MethodA systematic review of the literature was undertaken. A search of Medline, Cinahl, PubMed Central and Google Scholar was undertaken supplemented by a review of reference lists, author searching and review of NICE evidence base for existing guidelines. Included studies were assessed for bias using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment tool and data were extracted systematically using a purposefully designed electronic data extraction proforma.ResultsSeven studies were included in final review. The age range of participants extended from 0 to 19 years. Only one study with a patient age range of 0–14 used sedation. Sensitivity estimates from the included studies ranged from 92% to 100% while specificity ranged from 89% to 100%. A significant variation in the number and type of sequences was noted between the studies.ConclusionMRI offers high sensitivity and specificity comparable to contrast enhanced CT and greater than ultrasound as reported in the literature. Where accessibility is not a restriction, MRI is a viable alternative to ultrasound in the assessment and diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis. Clinical practice recommendations have been provided to facilitate the translation of evidence into practice.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Radiography - Volume 22, Issue 3, August 2016, Pages 244–251
نویسندگان
, , ,