کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2892670 1172337 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Impact of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin co-administration on platelet reactivity in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تأثیر تجویز اتورواستاتین یا روووواستاتین بر واکنش پلاکتی در بیماران تحت درمان با آنتی بادی تیروئید دوگانه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی


• Statins and dual antiplatelet therapy are mandatory in coronary artery disease.
• Drug–drug interaction could influence suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents.
• In 374 patients receiving rosuvastatin or atorvastatin and dual antiplatelet therapy, platelet reactivity was assessed.
• Treatment with rosuvastatin is associated with an increased rate of high-residual platelet reactivity with clopidogrel.
• On the contrary, statin type does not influence the antiplatelet effect of ASA or ticagrelor.

BackgroundResidual high-on treatment platelet reactivity (HRPR) still represents a challenging matter in patients with coronary artery disease. Drug-to-drug interaction has been suggested between some statin and antiplatelet agents, despite their co-administration is mandatory in patients after an acute cardiovascular event or coronary stenting. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate any impact of rosuvastatin or atorvastatin co-administration on platelet reactivity in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).MethodsOur population is represented by patients on DAPT (ASA and either clopidogrel 75 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg b.i.d) after an ACS or percutaneous revascularization, and receiving rosuvastatin or atorvastatin. Platelet function was assessed by Multiplate Impedance Aggregometry (Roche Diagnostics AG).ResultsWe included a total of 374 patients, 240 (64.2%) receiving atorvastatin, 134 (35.8%) rosuvastatin. Rosuvastatin treated patients were more often using beta-blockers (p = 0.05), diuretics (p = 0.04) and displayed higher HDL (p < 0.001) and lower LDL cholesterol (p < 0.001). The prevalence of HRPR for ASA was low, with no difference according to statin type (0.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.62, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2[0.23–16.6], p = 0.52). Concerning ADP-antagonists, in the 163 patients treated with clopidogrel, rosuvastatin co-administration was associated with a significantly increased rate of HRPR (55.6%vs 32%, p = 0.01, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 2.69[1.22–5.96], p = 0.015) with higher ADP-mediated platelet reactivity (p = 0.01) and TRAP-test results (p = 0.04). On the contrary, in the 211 ticagrelor treated patients, statin type did not affect mean platelet reactivity or the prevalence of HRPR with ticagrelor (10.5% vs 11.2%, p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.86[0.34–2.22], p = 0.76)ConclusionsAmong patients receiving DAPT, rosuvastatin but not atorvastatin is associated with an increased rate of HRPR for clopidogrel, without any influence on the antiplatelet effect of ASA or ticagrelor. Therefore, cautiousness should be exerted for clopidogrel and rosuvastatin therapeutic association.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Atherosclerosis - Volume 243, Issue 2, December 2015, Pages 389–394
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,