کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3376748 1219927 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Varicella zoster virus antibody detection: A comparison of four commonly used techniques
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
تشخیص آنتی بادی ویروس زونا آبله مرغان: مقایسه چهار روش معمول استفاده شده
کلمات کلیدی
ویروس واریسلا زوستر؛ آنتی بادی؛ واکسن؛ FAMA؛ EIACDC، مراکز کنترل بیماری و پیشگیری؛ CF، آزمون مکمل ثابت؛ CMI، واسطه سلول-ایمنی؛ EIA، ایمونواسی آنزیمی؛ ELISA، آنزیم وابسته به ایمنی اسیدهای ارگانیک؛ FAMA، آنتی بادی فلورسنت T
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی میکروبیولوژی و بیوتکنولوژی کاربردی
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundAntibody tests for the varicella zoster virus (VZV) include neutralization, fluorescent antibody to membrane antigen (FAMA), immune adherence hemagglutination (IAHA), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), glycoprotein-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (gpELISA), and complement fixation (CF) tests. Of these, FAMA is considered the most sensitive. However, in Japan, the EIA method is most frequently employed.ObjectiveThe VZV antibody detection rate of the FAMA, EIA, gpELISA, and IAHA methods was compared.MethodsFour types of antibody tests were conducted with sera collected from 83 college students. The relationships between two antibody tests were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficients.ResultsAll 83 subjects were observed to be VZV antibody-positive using the FAMA method. The Pearson correlation coefficients of gpELISA, EIA, and IAHA relative to FAMA were 0.808, 0.782, and 0.356, respectively. The positive agreement rate of IAHA relative to FAMA was 88.0% (73/83), whereas those of gpELISA and EIA were both 97.6% (81/83). Furthermore, EIA showed 100% positive agreement with gpELISA and a high correlation coefficient of 0.911, whereas these values for IAHA compared to gpELISA were much lower (90.1% and 0.530). The calculated Pearson correlation coefficient for comparison of the EIA and IAHA methods was 0.498, with a positive agreement rate of 90.1% (73/81).ConclusionsThe EIA method should be employed in Japan based on the similarity of the positivity between EIA and gpELISA, as it is more available and practical than gpELISA.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy - Volume 22, Issue 4, April 2016, Pages 225–228
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,