کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
345972 | 617778 | 2015 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Stakeholders describe common barriers to coordinated ECE-child welfare services.
• Workplace climate and unclear and frequently changing policies hinder ECE use.
• Child welfare involvement limits access to ECE subsidies and affordable care.
• Changes in living arrangements disrupt ECE continuity for foster children.
• Child welfare workers often fail to prioritize quality ECE for infants/toddlers.
Emerging evidence suggests that high quality early care and education (ECE) programs can improve children's developmental outcomes, particularly for at-risk children. Yet, ECE remains under-utilized by children in the child welfare system. This study illuminates some of the reasons for this by presenting findings from a series of ten focus groups with child welfare workers, ECE providers, and parents/caregivers of young children involved with the child welfare system (N = 78). Fourteen themes emerged regarding organizational and system-level barriers to enrolling children involved with the child welfare system in ECE. These include generic barriers to inter-agency collaboration in human services, such as challenging work climates characterized by limited resources, high workloads and staff turnover, and lack of guidelines for collaborative infrastructure. Findings more specific to inter-agency collaboration between child welfare and ECE include the disruptive effect of foster placement changes and case closures on ECE stability, policies restricting ECE eligibility and availability for birth and/or foster parents, and child welfare workers' limited understanding of the value of high quality, learning based ECE programs versus custodial child care, particularly for infants and toddlers. Policy and practice recommendations to improve ECE utilization and service coordination among child welfare and ECE organizations are discussed.
Journal: Children and Youth Services Review - Volume 55, August 2015, Pages 170–181