کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4366343 1616560 2016 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Evaluation of cephamycins as supplements to selective agar for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass rinses
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی cephamycins به عنوان مکمل برای آگار انتخابی برای تشخیص کمپیلوباکتر گونههای بررسی cephamycins به عنوان مکمل به انتخابی آگار برای تشخیص Campylobacter spp. در شستشوی لاشه مرغ
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک دانش تغذیه
چکیده انگلیسی


• Modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) was improved by supplementation with cefotetan and cefoxitin.
• The ability of the modified medium to isolate Campylobacter from chicken carcass rinse was compared to that of normal mCCDA.
• Improved mCCDA yielded significantly better isolation rate and selectivity than those achieved on using normal mCCDA.

Although cefoperazone is the most commonly used antibiotic in Campylobacter-selective media, the distribution of cefoperazone-resistant bacteria such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing. Here we evaluated the potential of cephamycins for use as supplements to improve modified charcoal-cefoperazone-deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) by replacing cefoperazone with the same concentrations (32 mg/L) of cefotetan (modified charcoal-cefotetan-deoxycholate agar, mCCtDA) and cefoxitin (modified charcoal-cefoxitin-deoxycholate agar, mCCxDA). In chicken carcass rinse samples, the number of mCCDA plates detecting for Campylobacter (18/70, 26%) was significantly lower than that of mCCtDA (42/70, 60%) or mCCxDA plates (40/70, 57%). The number of mCCDA plates (70/70, 100%) that were contaminated with non-Campylobacter species was significantly higher than that of mCCtDA (20/70, 29%) or mCCxDA plates (21/70, 30%). The most common competing species identified using mCCDA was ESBL-producing E. coli, while Pseudomonas species frequently appeared on mCCtDA and mCCxDA.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Food Microbiology - Volume 223, 16 April 2016, Pages 75–78
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,