کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
4576003 1629934 2014 20 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A negotiation support system for disputes between Iraq and Turkey over the Tigris-Euphrates basin
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک سیستم پشتیبانی مذاکره برای اختلافات میان عراق و ترکیه در حوزه دریای تیرس فرات
کلمات کلیدی
آب مرزی پشتیبانی سیستم مذاکره، عراق، بوقلمون، رود فرات، رودخانه تیررس
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه علوم زمین و سیارات فرآیندهای سطح زمین
چکیده انگلیسی


• A NSS for disputes between Iraq and Turkey over the Tigris-Euphrates basin.
• A NSS based on context suggested and UN Convention principles recognised by Turkey.
• Negotiation outcomes arising from dynamic interactions between the parties.
• An application of the NSS based on plausible and reasonable, but tentative, data.
• Contextual water allocation rules in the negotiation and cooperation scenarios.

SummaryThis paper describes a flexible prototype negotiation support system (NSS), to be used in a participatory context, based on the negotiation setting that was suggested by Turkey: bilateral negotiations between Turkey and Iraq, annual analysis, the assumption that Iraq and Syria have no inherent water rights, differences in water entitlements or needs are neglected, analysis restricted to the Tigris-Euphrates basin, current irrigation technologies in Turkey and Iraq, and negotiations on water quantity and quality that account for national dam construction plans. The analysis is based on all principles of the 1997 UN Convention that are recognised by Turkey: net benefits defined at a basin level, equitable use, non-significant harm, maintenance of water quality. The goal is to achieve a balance of interests among the parties that combines analysis of the quantity and quality of water and the net benefits. The negotiation outcomes arise from simulated dynamic interactions between the parties. We demonstrate an application of the NSS based on plausible and reasonable, but tentative, data to provide insights into water allocation rules, side-payments, water requirements of the two parties, and cooperation. Allocations should meet Iraqi non-significant harm and equitable use constraints and allocate the remaining water to Turkey for agricultural use in the feasible negotiation scenario, whereas allocations should meet Turkish maximum agricultural water demands and allocate the remaining water to Iraq for agricultural use in the unlikely cooperation scenario.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Hydrology - Volume 514, 6 June 2014, Pages 65–84
نویسندگان
, ,