کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5037182 | 1472387 | 2017 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
کلمات کلیدی
1.مقدمه
2. جنبه ها
2.1. فناوری - ایجاد محیط
2.2. دموکراسی - تفکر و عمل جدا کردن
3. جایگزینها
4- مخالفت مداوم
5. متغیرهای بیشتر
6. در نظریه سازمان شیمیایی
7. نتیجه گیری: درسهایی برای مغز جهانی
- The interplay between local elements and a bigger structure is investigated.
- This interplay can evolve into an imposing structure with an asymmetrical influence.
- Constant opposition can change a power-law into a more equal, dynamic distribution.
- The interplay between technology and society, and thoughts and acts is elaborated.
- The path of the global brain is not predetermined, but depends on human agency.
In various domains, there is an interplay at work: elements form and influence a structure, but this structure in turn influences the elements. By time, rigidity often turns in: the structure start to have its own goals, and cant be influenced anymore by the elements. How can one avoid this from happening? I propose two strategies: make sure there is enough diversity, and endorse a constant opposition. To illustrate this last countermeasure, I built a simulation. This showed that it is possible to avoid the emergence of the classical power-law distribution, giving rise to a more dynamical situation where the top agent is constantly changing. These considerations are applied to the concept of the global brain, in order to avoid that this becomes another imposing structure.
Journal: Technological Forecasting and Social Change - Volume 114, January 2017, Pages 27-34