کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5527727 | 1547888 | 2017 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- ELN recommendations may be used for risk stratification of AML patients in LMIC.
- OS, DFS and EFS in LMIC were shorter than the reported in Europe and US.
- Socioeconomic issues should be consider for treatment failure in LMIC.
BackgroundCurrent results regarding treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) point to significant differences between low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and high-income countries (HIC). Excluding well-known socioeconomic issues, genetic markers important for prognosis have not been properly incorporated into the clinical practice so far and their usefulness outside of well-controlled clinical trials remain unknown.MethodsHere, we assessed the clinical significance of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 196 consecutive patients with AML in a real-life setting. All patients were younger than 60 years of age (49% male) and treated with conventional chemotherapy for induction and consolidation in three Brazilian Institutions that well represent Brazilian geographic and socioeconomic diversity.FindingsMultivariable analysis showed that ELN recommendations had a slight association with complete remission achievement (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.53-1.01; PÂ =Â 0.06), but were independently associated with poor overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.54; PÂ =Â 0.002), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.95; PÂ =Â 0.028) and event-free survival (EFS) (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.47; PÂ =Â 0.007), considering initial leukocyte counts and age as confounders. ELN recommendations had no impact on cumulative incidence of relapse (PÂ =Â 0.09).InterpretationOur results suggest that within the context of LMIC, the prognostic markers recommended by ELN may be useful to predict patient's clinical outcomes; however, the OS, DFS and EFS were shorter than the reported in Europe and US for the respective risk groups.
Journal: Leukemia Research - Volume 60, September 2017, Pages 109-114