کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5621864 1579187 2017 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Full Length ArticleSafety, feasibility and patient reported outcome measures of outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
طول کامل مقاله، ایمنی، امکان سنجی و بیمار گزارش شده است نتایج اندازه گیری درمان سرپایی آمبولی ریه
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی


- Despite growing evidence on the safety of outpatient treatment many patients with acute PE are still managed as inpatients.
- This study provides further evidence that outpatient treatment is safe in low-risk patients based on their PESI score.
- Our data on patient reported outcome measures support the presumption of a good recovery during outpatient treatment.

BackgroundDespite growing evidence on safe and feasible outpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism (PE), the majority of patients is still treated in an inpatient setting. This is probably due to a lack of clear guidelines on this subject.ObjectivesTo evaluate safety and patient reported outcome measures (PROM) on outpatient treatment of acute PE.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study. 250 patients presenting with acute PE and Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class I or II were enrolled. Safety of outpatient treatment was assessed by measuring all-cause mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and episodes of relevant bleeding, with a follow-up period of four weeks and six months. Additionally, PROM's on outpatient treatment were evaluated by repeatedly measuring VAS-scores for pain and dyspnea during the recovery, and by assessing the improvement in SF-36 scores between admission and after six months.ResultsWe found an all-cause mortality rate of 0.4% (95% CI 0.07-2.23), rate of recurrent VTE of 0% (95% CI 0-1.51) and rate of relevant bleeding episodes of 6.4% (95% CI 3.98-10.14). VAS-scores improved significantly during the first 24-h after admission, and continued to improve significantly after five days of home treatment. SF-36 scores on 6 out of 8 domains improved significantly between admission and after six months.ConclusionsOur study shows that outpatient treatment is safe in selected low-risk patients based on their PESI score. Additionally, our data on patient reported outcome measures support the presumption of a good course of recovery during outpatient treatment.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Thrombosis Research - Volume 156, August 2017, Pages 172-176
نویسندگان
, , , ,