|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|5627156||1406342||2017||3 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود کنید|
- Rates of IV alteplase use is not higher at telestroke sites.
- Outcomes between the two cohorts are similar.
- No complications were noted among stroke mimic patients exposed to alteplase.
ObjectiveThe safety and outcomes of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) to stroke patients via telestroke (TS) is similar to those presenting to stroke centers. Little is known on the accuracy of TS diagnosis among those receiving IVT. We sought to compare the rate of patients receiving IVT with diagnosis of ischemic stroke as opposed to stroke mimic (SM) in our TS network to those who presented to our comprehensive stroke center (CSC).Materials and methodsConsecutive patients receiving IVT between August 2014 and June 2015 were identified at our CSC and TS network. We compared rates of SM, post-IVT symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, and discharge destination.ResultsWe evaluated 131 receiving IVT were included in the analysis. Rates of SM receiving IVT were similar (CSC 12% versus 7% TS, pÂ =Â 0.33). Four stroke patients experienced sICH or in-hospital mortality; neither were found among SM patients. Discharge destination was similar between stroke and SM patients (pÂ =Â 0.9). SM patients had higher diagnoses of migraine (pÂ =Â 0.05) and psychiatric illness (pÂ <Â 0.01).ConclusionThe accuracy of diagnosing stroke in IVT-eligible patients evaluated via TS is similar to evaluations at our CSC. Continued efforts should be made to minimize exposure of SM patients to IVT in both settings.
Journal: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery - Volume 153, February 2017, Pages 5-7