کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5665589 1591175 2017 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
In vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and soft tissue infections to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
حساسیت به انسولین مقاوم به متسییلین مقاوم به استافیلوکوکوس اورئوس از عفونت های پوستی و بافت نرم تا وانکومایسین، داپتومایسین، لینزولید و تدیزید
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی ایمونولوژی و میکروب شناسی (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی

IntroductionTreatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus remains as a clinical challenge due to emergence of new resistance mechanisms. Tedizolid is a next-generation oxazolidinone, recently approved for skin and soft tissues infections. We conducted a study to determine in vitro susceptibility to vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid and tedizolid in MRSA clinical isolates from adult patients with skin and soft tissue infections.Material and methodsMethicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were collected in three tertiary-care hospitals of Medellin, Colombia, from February 2008 to June 2010 as part of a previous study. Clinical characteristics were assessed by medical records and MIC values were determined by Epsilometer test. Genotypic analysis included spa typing, MLST, and SCCmec typing.ResultsA total of 150 MRSA isolates were evaluated and tedizolid MIC values obtained showed higher in vitro activity than other antimicrobials, with MIC values ranging from 0.13 μg/mL to 0.75 μg/mL and lower values of MIC50 and MIC90 (0.38 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL). In contrast, vancomycin and linezolid had higher MIC values, which ranged from 0.5 μg/mL to 2.0 μg/mL and from 0.38 μg/mL to 4.0 μg/mL, respectively. Tedizolid MICs were 2- to 5-fold lower than those of linezolid. Clinical characteristics showed high previous antimicrobial use and hospitalization history. The majority of the strains belong to the CC8 harboring the SCCmec IVc and were associated with the spa t1610 (29.33%, n = 44).ConclusionIn vitro effectiveness of tedizolid was superior for isolates from skin and soft tissue infections in comparison with the other antibiotics evaluated. The above added to its less toxicity, good bioavailability, daily dose and unnecessity of dosage adjustment, make tedizolid in a promising alternative for the treatment of infections caused by MRSA.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases - Volume 21, Issue 5, September–October 2017, Pages 493-499
نویسندگان
, , , ,