کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5716274 1606648 2017 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Original contributionDetermination of esophageal eosinophil counts and other histologic features of eosinophilic esophagitis by pathology trainees is highly accurate
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
همکاری اصلی تعریف تعداد ائوزینوفیل های مری و دیگر ویژگی های بافت شناسی ریزش شناسی ائوزینوفیلی توسط دانشجویان پاتولوژی بسیار دقیق است
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی آسیب‌شناسی و فناوری پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی


- The study assessed nonexpert trainee pathologists compared with expert pathologists.
- Correlation was excellent between trainees and experts for total eosinophil counts.
- Agreement was excellent for eosinophil counts above the diagnostic threshold.
- Agreement was very good for degranulation and spongiosis but not for microabscesses.

SummaryMany studies of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) use expert pathology review, but it is unknown whether less experienced pathologists can reliably assess EoE histology. We aimed to determine whether trainee pathologists can accurately quantify esophageal eosinophil counts and identify associated histologic features of EoE, as compared with expert pathologists. We used a set of 40 digitized slides from patients with varying degrees of esophageal eosinophilia. Each of 6 trainee pathologists underwent a teaching session and used our validated protocol to determine eosinophil counts and associated EoE findings. The same slides had previously been evaluated by expert pathologists, and these results comprised the criterion standard. Eosinophil counts were correlated, and agreement was calculated for the diagnostic threshold of 15 eosinophils per high-power field as well as for associated EoE findings. Peak eosinophil counts were highly correlated between the trainees and the criterion standard (ρ ranged from 0.87 to 0.92; P < .001 for all). Peak counts were also highly correlated between trainees (0.75-0.91; P < .001), and results were similar for mean counts. Agreement was excellent for determining if a count exceeded the diagnostic threshold (κ ranged from 0.83 to 0.89; P < .001). Agreement was very good for eosinophil degranulation (κ = 0.54-0.83; P < .01) and spongiosis (κ = 0.44-0.87; P < .01) but was lower for eosinophil microabscesses (κ = 0.37-0.64; P < .01). In conclusion, using a teaching session, digitized slide set, and validated protocol, the agreement between pathology trainees and expert pathologists for determining eosinophil counts was excellent. Agreement was very good for eosinophil degranulation and spongiosis but less so for microabscesses.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Human Pathology - Volume 62, April 2017, Pages 50-55
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , ,