کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
910269 1473065 2016 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-help therapeutic interventions for obsessive–compulsive disorder: Is therapeutic contact key to overall improvement?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
یک مرور نظام مند و متاآنالیز از مداخلات درمانی خودکمکی برای اختلال وسواس: آیا تماس درمانی کلید بهبود کلی است؟
کلمات کلیدی
خودکمکی ؛ مرور نظاممند؛ فراتحلیل؛ تماس با درمانی؛ اختلال وسواس اجباری (OCD)
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی روانپزشکی و بهداشت روانی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Large effect sizes were identified for minimal-contact self-help (g = 0.91).
• Moderate effect sizes were identified for predominantly self-help (g = 0.68).
• Small effect sizes were identified for self-administered self-help (g = 0.33).
• Studies with greater therapeutic contact reported lower drop-out rates.

Background and objectivesThe presence of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) can result in low quality of life, with significant impairments in social and occupational functioning. An increase in the dissemination of self-help programs has been observed in the treatment of OCD, and has provided improved accessibility to treatment. The present study examined the efficacy of self-help interventions for OCD in the context of therapeutic contact.MethodsRandomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were identified through computerised database searches. Self-help format (bibliotherapy, internet-based, computerised), and therapeutic contact were examined for their effect on treatment outcomes.ResultsEighteen studies targeting self-help for OCD met inclusion criteria with 1570 participants. The average post-treatment effect size (Hedges' g) of self-help interventions on primary outcomes was .51 (95% CI: .41 to 0.61). Subgroup analysis revealed large effect sizes for minimal-contact self-help (g = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.17), moderate effect sizes for predominantly self-help (g = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.96), and small effect sizes for self-administered self-help (g = 0.33, 95% CI: .18 to 0.47).LimitationsA large variation of treatment approaches, amount of therapeutic contact, and risk of bias within each study may account for the large magnitude in effect sizes across studies. Additionally, the long-term follow-up effects of treatment approaches were not examined.ConclusionsA growing body of literature supporting to the use of self-help treatments for OCD is evident, however, further investigation through use of randomised controlled trials is required, particularly the use of stepped care and long-term effectiveness.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry - Volume 51, June 2016, Pages 74–83
نویسندگان
, , , ,