|کد مقاله||کد نشریه||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||نسخه تمام متن|
|918889||919850||2016||3 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||دانلود کنید|
In a recent study, Adame (2016) demonstrated that training people to use the consider-the-opposite strategy can successfully reduce anchoring effects. In this commentary, I reconsider the implications of Adame’s results and argue that although they do not provide additional evidence for the Selective Accessibility Model, they do reveal the effectiveness of the consider-the-opposite strategy for reducing anchoring effects that result from both semantic and numeric priming.
Journal: Learning and Motivation - Volume 53, February 2016, Pages 49–51