کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
919618 1473589 2016 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Culturally inconsistent spatial structure reduces learning
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ساختار فضایی متناقض فرهنگی یادگیری را کاهش می دهد
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی علوم اعصاب شناختی
چکیده انگلیسی


• American and Israeli adults were tasked with learning arbitrary stimuli pairs.
• The to-be-recalled information was presented from left-to-right, right-to-left, or centrally.
• Learning was decreased when information was presented in a direction opposite of the culture's dominant reading and writing system.
• This effect appears only when learning information that is typically ordinal to the subjects.

Human adults tend to use a spatial continuum to organize any information they consider to be well-ordered, with a sense of initial and final position. The directionality of this spatial mapping is mediated by the culture of the subject, largely as a function of the prevailing reading and writing habits (for example, from left-to-right for English speakers or right-to-left for Hebrew speakers). In the current study, we tasked American and Israeli subjects with encoding and recalling a set of arbitrary pairings, consisting of frequently ordered stimuli (letters with shapes: Experiment 1) or infrequently ordered stimuli (color terms with shapes: Experiment 2), that were serially presented in a left-to-right, right-to-left, or central-only manner. The subjects were better at recalling information that contained ordinal stimuli if the spatial flow of presentation during encoding matched the dominant directionality of the subjects' culture, compared to information encoded in the non-dominant direction. This phenomenon did not extend to infrequently ordered stimuli (e.g., color terms). These findings suggest that adults implicitly harness spatial organization to support memory, and this harnessing process is culturally mediated in tandem with our spatial biases.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Acta Psychologica - Volume 169, September 2016, Pages 20–26
نویسندگان
, ,