Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1001130 Utilities Policy 2011 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

In this article we compare four Norwegian public utilities sectors: the electricity industry, the e-com industry, the railway and the postal service. All sectors have been subject to public policy reforms since the 1980s, though reform content and degree varies. In the electricity industry Norway is a liberalization forerunner – a virtual reform “hare”, to borrow from Olsen’s (1996) Aesop’s fable metaphor. In other network industries such as the railway Norway is a reform “tortoise”. We seek to answer the question: How and why has governance of the four industries been reformed? We explore four possible explanations for similarities and differences across sectors: technological change, market conditions, agency and European Union (EU) regulation. We cannot identify a national model for reforms across these sectors. We find single factors standing out in the explanation of the reforms in the various sectors. The puzzle is that it is different factors in different sectors.

► Technological change creates opportunities for actors to advance governance reform. ► A shrinking marked may hold back governance reform. ► Reform processes and outcomes vary substantially across public utilities. ► The study confirms the rationale for a policy sector approach to governance reform. ► We cannot conclude on necessary and sufficient explanations of governance reform.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy (General)
Authors
, ,