Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10051630 | The Journal of Urology | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
FGV is potentially less time-consuming than standard microsurgical vasovasostomy, and may be appropriate for patients with sperm on intraoperative SA or a negative intraoperative SA, and an obstructive interval of 10 years or less. Patients without these findings should be considered for vasoepididymostomy. While the early results of FGV are promising, a larger study group with the ability to obtain longer followup is required to definitively establish equivalency to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Nephrology
Authors
KHAI-LINH V. HO, MATTHEW N. WITTE, ERIN T. BIRD, SAMUEL HAKIM,