Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10051630 The Journal of Urology 2005 4 Pages PDF
Abstract
FGV is potentially less time-consuming than standard microsurgical vasovasostomy, and may be appropriate for patients with sperm on intraoperative SA or a negative intraoperative SA, and an obstructive interval of 10 years or less. Patients without these findings should be considered for vasoepididymostomy. While the early results of FGV are promising, a larger study group with the ability to obtain longer followup is required to definitively establish equivalency to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Nephrology
Authors
, , , ,