Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10081885 | The Journal of Arthroplasty | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
Intramedullary instrumentation for femoral component alignment during total knee arthroplasty is readily used. Newer alignment techniques using computer navigation are now available. This study assesses the difference in the sagittal and coronal plane alignments using a cadaveric model with 3 different entry points for intramedullary alignment compared with a navigation system. Seven cadaveric limb's results show that the anterior starting point resulted in recurvatum (â2.2° ± 1.4° ), the middle starting point resulted in 1.9° ± 2.2° of flexion, and the posterior starting point in 3.8° ± 2.6° of flexion compared with the calculated femoral axis by the computer navigation system. When comparing the valgus angle, no statistical difference between any methods resulted (average 5.2° ± 0.9° valgus). The anterior and posterior starting points were significantly different in the sagittal plane. These data suggest that alignment can be significantly affected by the starting point chosen for intramedullary instrumentation.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Authors
William M. MD, PhD, James MD, Lindsey D. Clark, Kenneth A. MD,