| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10145877 | Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice | 2018 | 27 Pages |
Abstract
The ETS system was piloted in summer 2013, and the “go live” date was 1st September 2014. Data was collected 'live', in March 2014, featuring 21 interviews, with the aim of better understanding the expected challenges and impacts on the business stakeholders. At the time, stakeholders accepted that the project would go ahead: while further implementation challenges remained, few anticipated them to fully derail the project within 6â¯months. Retrospective analysis of the data collected in March 2014 can help to deepen policymakers' insights into why the project ultimately failed and better understand the main lessons to be learnt. The findings show that the écotaxe, presented as environmental taxation by policymakers, had been in reality perceived and accepted by business stakeholders as more of an infrastructure tax. Interestingly, this in itself does not explain the failure. The main explanation is to be found in the perceived inequities associated with the charging approach, excluding privately-operated motorways, and the failure of the ad valorem surcharging system designed as a means of passing the tax costs to shippers. These findings should be valuable for policymakers anywhere the introduction of a similar ETS system is being contemplated.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Civil and Structural Engineering
Authors
Patrick Rigot-Müller,
