Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
101869 Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2015 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Temperature and curing times directly affect gelatine projectile penetration.•Penetration results are not affected by different water types during manufacture.•20% concentration of 285 Bloom at 20 °C is a suitable soft tissue simulant.•Ordnance gelatine manufacture must be standardized to allow comparison of results.

A study was undertaken to determine whether different concentrations of ordnance gelatine, water types, temperatures and curing times would have an effect on projectile penetration of a gelatine tissue surrogate. Both Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) specified gelatines were compared against the FBI calibration standard.10% w/w and 20% w/w concentrations of gelatine with Bloom numbers of 250 and 285 were prepared and cured at variable temperatures (3–20 °C) for 21 hours–3 weeks. Each block was shot on four occasions on the same range using steel calibre 4.5 mm BBs fired from a Daisy® air rifle at the required standard velocity of 180 ± 4.5 m/s, to ascertain the mean penetration depth.The results showed no significant difference in mean penetration depth using the three different water types (p > 0.05). Temperature changes and curing times did affect penetration depth. At 10 °C, mean penetration depth with 20% gelatine 285 Bloom for the two water types tested was 49.7 ± 1.5 mm after 21 h curing time, whereas the same formulation at 20 °C using two different water types was 79.1 ± 2.1 mm after 100 h curing time (p < 0.001).Neither of the NATO 20% concentrations of gelatine at 10 °C or a 20% concentration of 285 Bloom gelatine at 10 °C met the same calibration standard as the FBI recommended 10% formulation at 4 °C. A 20% concentration of 285 Bloom at 20 °C met the same calibration/penetration criteria as a 10% concentration of 250 Bloom at 4 °C after 100 h of curing, therefore matching the FBI calibration standard for a soft tissue simulant for wound ballistics research. These results demonstrate significant variability in simulant properties. Failure to standardise ballistic simulants may invalidate experimental results.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Genetics
Authors
, , , ,