Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10214643 | Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2018 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support any particular approach to aortic repair in patients with CTD and a dearth of comparative data between open repair and endovascular repair. There are distinct differences in the published lengths of follow-up between the two repair approaches as well as in the prevalence of their use in an acute vs elective setting. It is evident that endovascular interventions for aortic disease in patients with CTDs are associated with many device- and aorta-related complications both in the short term and in the long term. Despite the lack of level 1 evidence, open repair currently remains the standard approach to treatment of aortic disease due to CTDs. Open branched graft repair in particular is the preferred technique. Endovascular interventions may be cautiously used in patients with CTDs in selective circumstances.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
Natalia O. MD, PhD, FACS, Duke E. MD, FACS, James H. MD, FACS,