Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10300474 | European Neuropsychopharmacology | 2005 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
Methods: Patients (n = 302) with bipolar I disorder (manic episode) were randomised to 12 weeks' double-blind treatment with quetiapine (flexibly dosed up to 800 mg/day), placebo, or haloperidol (up to 8 mg/day). The primary efficacy outcome variable was change from baseline to Day 21 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score. Results: YMRS score improved with quetiapine at Day 21 (â12.29 versus â8.32 for placebo; P < 0.01). The difference in favor of quetiapine increased by Day 84 (â17.52 versus â9.48; P < 0.001). Haloperidol also showed an advantage over placebo at Days 21 and 84 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in efficacy measures between quetiapine and haloperidol groups at any assessment except Day 21. The only common adverse event with quetiapine was somnolence (12.7%). Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), including akathisia, occurred at 59.6% with haloperidol, 12.7% with quetiapine, 15.8% with placebo. Most quetiapine responders (84%) received a dose of 400-800 mg/day. Conclusions: Quetiapine was effective and well tolerated. The efficacy and tolerability profile of haloperidol (including its propensity for EPS) supported study validity.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Biological Psychiatry
Authors
Roger S. McIntyre, Martin Brecher, Björn Paulsson, Karin Huizar, Jamie Mullen,