| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10312189 | Computers and Composition | 2005 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
This response to Kress agrees that it is vital to identify gains and losses afforded by changing media but questions his reliance on binaries and periodization. It suggests a return to James Gibson's affordances; more precise analysis of semiotic objects; and sociohistoric theories that link semiotic artifacts, individual development, and social practice.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Paul Prior,