| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1035064 | Journal of Anthropological Archaeology | 2011 | 14 Pages |
The raw materials from which stone tools are made can provide considerable information relevant to behavioral variation within a prehistoric population. By examining the stone used for tools from two different types of Late Pithouse period (A.D. 550–1000) residential sites from the Mimbres Mogollon area of Southwestern New Mexico, this paper illustrates how understanding the lithic landscape of a region provides a means to assess behavioral variation in stone procurement practices. The analysis indicates that the differences in mobility and economic pursuits between longer-term residential sites containing pit structures and a shorter-term seasonal residential site with ephemeral architecture structured the raw material procurement practices of site’s occupants. Pit structure sites were focused on agricultural pursuits and used a technology that centered on the production of informal tools fashioned from locally available raw materials. The seasonal residential site focused on wild resources and evidenced greater reliance on formal tool production using raw materials acquired from beyond the immediate vicinity of the site. Despite increasing sedentism and agricultural dependence of the region’s population, some portion of the population exercised seasonal mobility strategies and associated technological and behavioral practices more typical of hunting and gathering populations, suggesting a diverse socio-economic system within the region.
Graphical abstractThe results of this study show that economic pursuits and differences in occupation duration at Mimbres Mogollon sites structured not only stone procurement practices but also the manner in which lithic technology was organized during the Late Pithouse period.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload high-quality image (147 K)Download as PowerPoint slideResearch highlights► Prehistoric agricultural populations are not monolithic. ► Lithic technological choice reveals variation in population practice. ► Choice is conditioned by raw material availability. ► But, differences in mobility and economic pursuits at sites also structures choice.
