Experimental production of bending and radial flake fractures and implications for lithic technologies

Bend and radially broken flake tools have been identified in Paleolithic and Paleoindian assemblages, and their presence raises important questions. Were these breaks intentionally produced to serve as tool edges or were broken flakes simply scavenged? More importantly, can we distinguish between intentionally produced breaks and those produced incidentally? Experimental archaeology can help answer these questions. In this paper, three sets of experimentally produced bend and radial flake breaks were compared. Flakes were intentionally broken by percussion, and these breaks were compared to those produced during bifacial core reduction and by flake trampling. The presence of point of impact markers, near ninety degree break angles, and an assemblage with high percentages of bend and radial breaks distinguish intentional fracture from incidental fractures produced during bifacial reduction. High percentages of radial breaks distinguish intentional fracture from trampling. Finally, it may not be possible to identify intentional breaks in a bifacial reduction assemblage severely affected by flake-on-flake trampling.

► First comparison of intentional bend/radial breaks to core reduction and trampling. ► Impact markers, break angle, break count distinguish intentional from reduction. ► Radial break frequency can distinguish intentional production from trampling. ► Severely trampled assemblage may mask intentional breaks.