Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10433467 | Journal of Biomechanics | 2010 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Mean and maximum errors due to violation of the rigid body assumption varied greatly between models. The model with least error was the combination of navicular and cuboid (mean errors <=1.3°, average maximum error <=2.4°). Greatest error was seen for the model combining all the ten bones (mean errors <=4.4°, average maximum errors <=6.9°). Based on the errors reported a three segment mid and forefoot model is proposed: (1) Navicular and cuboid, (2) cuneiforms and metatarsals 1, 2 and 3, and (3) metatarsals 4 and 5. However the utility of this model will depend on the precise purpose of the in vivo foot kinematics research study being undertaken.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Biomedical Engineering
Authors
C.J. Nester, A.M. Liu, E. Ward, D. Howard, J. Cocheba, T. Derrick,