Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10458521 | Consciousness and Cognition | 2013 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
To assess the relative contribution of these processes, we factorially varied subliminal priming of action selection and expectation of action outcomes. Both factors affected SoA, and there was also a significant interaction. Compatible action primes increased SoA more strongly for unexpected than expected outcomes. Outcome expectation had strong effects on SoA following incompatible action priming, but only weak effects following compatible action priming. Prospective and retrospective SoA may have distinct and complementary functions.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Authors
Nura Sidarus, Valérian Chambon, Patrick Haggard,