Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10466306 | Neuropsychologia | 2009 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
Classical views on the electrophysiology of language assume that different event-related potential (ERP) components index distinct linguistic subdomains. Hence, left-anterior negativities are often viewed as correlates of rule-based linguistic knowledge, whereas centro-parietal negativities (N400s) are taken to reflect (non-rule-based) semantic memory or aspects of lexical-semantic predictability. The present ERP study of case marking in Hindi challenges this clear-cut dichotomy. Though determined by a grammatical rule, the choice of subject case in Hindi is also interpretively relevant as it constrains the range of possible interpretations of the subject. For incorrect subject cases, we observed an N400, which was followed by a late positivity under certain circumstances. This finding suggests that violations of rule-based knowledge may engender an N400 when the rule is interpretively relevant.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Kamal Kumar Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky, Dietmar Roehm, Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,