Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10468816 | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | 2005 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Self-handicapping, the creating or claiming of obstacles to one's performance to influence explanations given for subsequent outcomes, has been shown to have a host of attitudinal and behavioral consequences. Given the wide ranging impact of self-handicapping, it is important to understand the conditions under which self-handicapping is more or less likely to occur. Accordingly, the present study tested the hypothesis that people will be less likely to engage in self-handicapping if they have previously engaged in self-affirmation. The results of this study found that self-affirmation was more effective in reducing self-handicapping behavior when individuals experienced non-contingent success than when they experience contingent success. Theoretical contributions to the self-handicapping and self-affirmation literatures are discussed, as are practical implications.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Neuroscience
Behavioral Neuroscience
Authors
Phyllis A. Siegel, Joanne Scillitoe, Rochelle Parks-Yancy,