Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10471603 | Social Science & Medicine | 2012 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
We draw on institutional entrepreneurship theory to analyse the dynamics of institutional change in a healthcare context. The focus of our interest is in the relationship between an institutional entrepreneur's 'subject position', defined in terms of their structural and normative legitimacy within the existing institutional landscape, and the nature of the change enacted. We develop this approach through an examination of the implementation of new pathways for cancer genetic services within the English National Health Service. Employing comparative case analysis we show that those who have limited structural legitimacy under prevailing conditions are most willing to engender change, but also least able; whereas those who have strong structural legitimacy are most able, but often least willing. However, those who are able rhetorically to combine a balance of structural and normative legitimacy are most able to produce change. In doing so, we demonstrate the importance of the concept of institutional entrepreneurship to understand healthcare reform.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Andy Lockett, Graeme Currie, Justin Waring, Rachael Finn, Graham Martin,