Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10473152 | Social Science & Medicine | 2005 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The data suggest that although almost all GPs believed costs should be taken into account when prescribing, there was great variation in the extent to which this was applied and to how sensitive GPs were to costs. Cost was secondary to clinical effectiveness and safety, whilst individual patient need was emphasized above other forms of rationality or notions of opportunity costs. Conflict was apparent between a PCO policy of cost-containment and GPs' resistance to cost-cutting. GPs largely applied simple cost-minimization while cost-consideration was undermined by contextual factors. Implications for research and policy are discussed.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Helen Prosser, Tom Walley,