Commercial mortgage underwriting: How well do lenders manage the risks?

Loan-to-value ratio and debt service coverage ratios have long been viewed as the two most important quantitative measures of the default risk of commercial mortgages. Option-based models of default provide strong theoretic support for the importance of original loan-to-value ratio. The same theoretical predictions have found strong empirical support in residential single-family mortgage analyses. However, recent empirical studies of commercial mortgage default have raised questions about the role of loan-to-value ratio in assessing the riskiness of commercial mortgages. These studies generally either find no relationship or a puzzling negative relationship between loan-to-value ratio and default. This paper uses a very large database of commercial loan histories to thoroughly investigate this issue. It finds strong evidence that loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are endogenous to the underwriting process. Lenders react to other-unmeasured-risk factors with credit rationing and pricing. As a result, unusually low loan-to-value ratio loans appear to have above average risk in other dimensions and their default probabilities are equal to or higher than average. The results show that the pricing spread that lenders establish as part of the underwriting process serves as an excellent summary measure of the riskiness of the loan. A test of lenders' ability to appropriately price loan-to-value risk finds that, while there is some unpriced effect of loan-to-value ratio after controlling for the lender's pricing, introducing lender pricing into the model removes the otherwise puzzling negative loan-to-value and default relationship previously observed in the literature.