Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10486268 | Value in Health | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Much of the current discussion on bias in prospective and retrospective QOL measurement suffers from unclear definitions, especially of “response shift” and “recall bias,” or from neglecting one of the possible biases. We suggest more elaborate definitions for different types of bias and recommend taking both kinds of bias into consideration when measuring change in QOL. The relevance of the different biases depends on the type of study, and so either prospective or retrospective assessment may be more appropriate.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
Christine PhD, Matthias Augustin,