Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10486268 Value in Health 2015 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Much of the current discussion on bias in prospective and retrospective QOL measurement suffers from unclear definitions, especially of “response shift” and “recall bias,” or from neglecting one of the possible biases. We suggest more elaborate definitions for different types of bias and recommend taking both kinds of bias into consideration when measuring change in QOL. The relevance of the different biases depends on the type of study, and so either prospective or retrospective assessment may be more appropriate.
Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Medicine and Dentistry (General)
Authors
, ,