Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10502332 Habitat International 2016 14 Pages PDF
Abstract
The main conclusions are two: 1) spatial planning is a quite political process (c.f. Flyvbjerg 1998), in which knowledge is contested or even when acknowledged, does not necessarily steer decision-making processes, either by local communities, authorities and private institutions. And 2) existing models linking knowledge construction to risk framing, risk tolerance and how these influence decision-making processes and actions to prevent disaster may ignore the issues of risk tolerance, through normalization and prioritization at their peril.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Social Sciences Development
Authors
, , , ,