Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10502332 | Habitat International | 2016 | 14 Pages |
Abstract
The main conclusions are two: 1) spatial planning is a quite political process (c.f. Flyvbjerg 1998), in which knowledge is contested or even when acknowledged, does not necessarily steer decision-making processes, either by local communities, authorities and private institutions. And 2) existing models linking knowledge construction to risk framing, risk tolerance and how these influence decision-making processes and actions to prevent disaster may ignore the issues of risk tolerance, through normalization and prioritization at their peril.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Social Sciences
Development
Authors
Liliana Miranda Sara, Shazade Jameson, Karin Pfeffer, Isa Baud,