Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10502727 | Health & Place | 2010 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Research is beginning to show differences between end-of-life care in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas. Using population-based post-mortem surveys this article compares medical end-of-life decisions in the Brussels metropolitan area and non-metropolitan Flanders (Belgium). In Brussels, administering lethal drugs without an explicit patient request occurred more often, intensification of symptom alleviation and non-treatment decisions less often, and end-of-life treatment was more often aimed at cure or life prolongation, than in non-metropolitan Flanders. This paper argues that these differences in end-of-life decisions are related to characteristics of the metropolitan environment and hence may also apply in other metropolitan regions worldwide. Specific approaches to end-of-life decisions in metropolitan areas need to be considered.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Joachim Cohen, Kenneth Chambaere, Johan Bilsen, Dirk Houttekier, Freddy Mortier, Luc Deliens,