| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10504958 | Global Environmental Change | 2012 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
⺠This study analyzes how different coalitions use competing frames to present adaptation and mitigation. ⺠Three discourses found on climate policy: mitigation only, adaptation and mitigation separated, and integrated. ⺠Despite being a vulnerable society to climate risks, the mitigation opportunity agenda is stronger than the adaptation priority in the Congo Basin. ⺠Government and private actors largely support mitigation either alone or separated from adaptation while IGOs, NGOs and research organizations prefer an integrated approach. ⺠In the struggle of dominance, the different frames articulated by the actors are not devoid of their interests and positions.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Environmental Science
Environmental Science (General)
Authors
Olufunso A. Somorin, H. Carolyn Peach Brown, Ingrid J. Visseren-Hamakers, Denis J. Sonwa, Bas Arts, Johnson Nkem,
