Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10504975 | Global Environmental Change | 2013 | 15 Pages |
Abstract
⺠We explore methodological strengths and weaknesses of three climate risk assessments, including the treatment of uncertainty. ⺠Methods strongly tied to climate outputs are subject to much epistemic uncertainty, but yield insights about climate threats and opportunities. ⺠Methods that build on local knowledge provide more tractable research questions but outcomes tend to apply to near term planning horizons. ⺠Consideration of both social and physical sciences is more likely to yield robust climate risk assessments.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Environmental Science
Environmental Science (General)
Authors
Marie Ekström, Natasha Kuruppu, Robert L. Wilby, Hayley J. Fowler, Francis H.S. Chiew, Suraje Dessai, William J. Young,