Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10505937 | Journal of Environmental Management | 2005 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
Our findings indicate that conservation alternatives such as passive and active riparian restoration, the width of riparian restoration zones, and the types of vegetation used in restoration activities should be selected based on the spatial distribution of riparian characteristics in the basin. The relative effectiveness of passive and active restoration plays an important role in determining the efficient allocations of conservation efforts. The time frame considered in the restoration efforts and the magnitude of desired temperature reductions also affect the efficient combinations of restoration activities. If the objective of conservation efforts is to maximize fish populations, then fishery benefits should be directly targeted. Targeting other criterion such as water temperatures would result in different allocations of conservation efforts, and therefore are not generally efficient.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Energy
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
Michio Watanabe, Richard M. Adams, JunJie Wu, John P. Bolte, Matt M. Cox, Sherri L. Johnson, William J. Liss, William G. Boggess, Joseph L. Ebersole,