| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10516539 | Public Health | 2010 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Despite some variability, the five domestic methods used to assess smoking status in China generally produced similar results to those based on SM, the method advocated by WHO. Discrepancies between domestic assessment methods peaked in estimating the prevalence of occasional smoking.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Infectious Diseases
Authors
T. Yang, I.R.H. Rockett, Y. Wu, W.W. Chen, Z. Lu,