Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10516620 | Public Health | 2005 | 20 Pages |
Abstract
Conclusion. The diversity of designs, definitions and methods in the current literature on FAs in general practice hampers comparison of their precision, validity and generalizability, and calls for cautious interpretation and adoption of a common, generally acceptable definition in future studies.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Infectious Diseases
Authors
P. Vedsted, M.B. Christensen,