Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1051770 | Electoral Studies | 2014 | 9 Pages |
•Results based on survey experiment.•Over one-half of respondents found fraud likely.•Shared partisanship reduces fraud concerns by over 20%.
This paper uses a survey experiment to assess what individuals understand about election fraud and under what circumstances they see it as a problem. I argue that political parties are central to answering both these questions. Results from the 2011 CCES survey suggest respondents are able to differentiate between the relative incentives of Democrats and Republicans where fraud tactics are concerned, but whether voters see these tactics as problematic is heavily influenced by partisan bias. The results show little support for the notion that partisan ideology drives fraud assessments, and suggest support for the idea that individual concerns for fraud are shaped a desire for their preferred candidate to win. These results offer insights that might be applied more broadly to questions of perceptions of electoral integrity and procedural fairness in democracies.