| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1052466 | Electoral Studies | 2008 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
The success and influence of survey-based electoral research is fueling the ambitions of survey analysts and producers. As a result, many new forms and uses of survey data are emerging. These new activities bring with them important questions about credibility. IÂ address several of these questions by discussing common practices in the production and analysis of election surveys. I contend that the continuation of some of these practices threatens the credibility of individual studies and, in some cases, the election-oriented survey enterprise as a whole. In all of these cases, however, I argue that a commitment to increased transparency about analytic and/or production decisions can enhance credibility. In the process, I provide suggestions and examples of how transparency can be increased.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Social Sciences
Geography, Planning and Development
Authors
Arthur Lupia,
