Strategic environmental assessment of energy planning tools. A study of Italian regions and provinces

•This is a comparative study on SEA report quality within Italian energy planning tools.•In Italy, the level of SEA implementation on energy planning is still poor.•External academic experts and internal officers assessed SEA reports' quality.•Outsiders and insiders unveil a similar judgement.•Most critical remarks concern consultation, monitoring measures, and follow-up.

SEA has been applied in different ways in EU energy and environmental planning instruments, because different member states have interpreted European Directive 2001/42/CE in a variety of ways. Italy, for example, has only recently completed the integration of the directive into its legislation, through a number of decrees which were approved between 2006 and 2010. As a result SEA practice in Italy is very fragmented, particularly with respect to energy planning, and needs to be steered towards homogeneous quality objectives. The aim of this paper is to study the quality of the SEA reports on the energy and environmental planning tools used by Italian regions and provinces. We study nine cases and use the methodology suggested by Fisher (2010) in his review of the quality of SEA. To be more precise, we integrate the views of external evaluators with those of a selection of the personnel directly involved in preparing the plans. Our results show that there are some differences in the quality scores given by the outsiders and insiders, although the two groups identified similar strengths and weaknesses in implementing SEA.