Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1053572 | Environmental Science & Policy | 2014 | 10 Pages |
•Case study in government department responsible for environmental policy.•Informal and lateral communication main sources informing risk management.•Risk governance framework not meeting knowledge requirements of decision makers.•Informal communication vulnerable to knowledge loss and resource constraints.•Explore systematic knowledge management to better support risk management.
Effective risk management within environmental policy making requires knowledge on natural, economic and social systems to be integrated; knowledge characterised by complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity. We describe a case study in a (UK) central government department exploring how risk governance supports and hinders this challenging integration of knowledge. Forty-five semi-structured interviews were completed over a two year period. We found that lateral knowledge transfer between teams working on different policy areas was widely viewed as a key source of knowledge. However, the process of lateral knowledge transfer was predominantly informal and unsupported by risk governance structures. We argue this made decision quality vulnerable to a loss of knowledge through staff turnover, and time and resource pressures. Our conclusion is that the predominant form of risk governance framework, with its focus on centralised decision-making and vertical knowledge transfer is insufficient to support risk-based, environmental policy making. We discuss how risk governance can better support environmental policy makers through systematic knowledge management practices.