| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1057226 | Journal of Environmental Management | 2011 | 9 Pages |
Florida is one of the largest spenders on the environment in the U.S. Employing a database from Florida counties, this study examines two distinct environmental funding areas in government: funding to protect the environment, and funding to develop the environment. These two types of funding serve different purposes, support different activities and operations, and draw from different revenue sources. The results show that environmental funding in government is a response to the environmental pressure generated by economic activities and population growth. Counties with a higher level of manufacturing and farming activity spend more to protect the environment, while counties with higher population densities spend more to develop the environment. Moreover, counties with more funding for public safety and economic development activities spend less on the environment, indicating that environmental funding is influenced by the political processes in public budgeting in which diversified interests compete for resources. These results show that environmental spending in government is the result of combined forces arising from environmental pressure and budgetary politics.
► There are two distinct environmental funding areas in government. ► These two areas support different activities and draw from different revenues. ► Environmental funding is a response to economic activities and population growth. ► Environmental spending is also a result of budgetary politics.
