Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1062073 | Political Geography | 2012 | 11 Pages |
Wars and their aftermaths frequently transform land use and ownership, reshaping ‘post-conflict’ landscapes through new boundaries, population movements, land reforms and conditions of access. Within a global context of controversial land concessions and farmland acquisitions, we bring to light the continued salience of historical memories of war in the ways land conflicts are being negotiated in Laos. Considering circumstances at different scales—from bilateral government relations to village-level claims—we find that political capital linked to memories of wartime affiliations have crucial spatial and place-based connections, and that they affect the ways investors, government officials and villagers negotiate over land concessions. Ethnographic evidence, spatial analysis and a survey of expatriate development workers engaged with land issues in Laos suggest that such ‘political memories’ are an important but often overlooked factor in shaping an uneven concessions landscape. We discuss implications for foreign development organizations that tend to privilege technical and legal aspects of land management over such political dimensions.
► The politics of ‘post-conflict’ land management are under appreciated in Laos. ► In Laos, positions are often closely linked to past roles during conflicts. ► The political make-up of Laos is closely linked to memories of past wars. ► ‘Political memories’ have crucial spatial dimensions and place-based connections. ► The importance of historical memories lies in silences as much as in evocation.