Reply to 'Comments on a theoretical study of the Gasarite eutectic growth'

This paper gives a reply to the comments paper [Drenchev L, Sobczak J, et al. Discussion of “A theoretical study of Gasarite eutectic growth”. Scripta Mater 2004;50] ('Comments on A Theoretical Study of the Gasarite Eutectic Growth') on our paper [Liu Y, Li Y. A theoretical study of gasarite eutectic growth. Scripta Mater 2003;49(5):379-386]. After detailed analysis, we think that the paper [Drenchev L, Sobczak J, et al. Discussion of “A theoretical study of Gasarite eutectic growth”. Scripta Mater 2004;50] presents an inaccurate understanding to the paper [Liu Y, Li Y. A theoretical study of gasarite eutectic growth. Scripta Mater 2003;49(5):379-386]. Our treatments in the paper [Liu Y, Li Y. A theoretical study of gasarite eutectic growth. Scripta Mater 2003;49(5):379-386] to those problems mentioned in the paper [Drenchev L, Sobczak J, et al. Discussion of “A theoretical study of Gasarite eutectic growth”. Scripta Mater 2004;50] are reasonable and have a sound theoretical and experimental foundation. In order to rectify this, the most important ones are analyzed.