Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
10643209 Solar Energy 2005 10 Pages PDF
Abstract
While the data shows high (geographic) variability, the substantial number of measurements allows reliable statistical analysis. The methods are found to give consistent results in spite of the necessity to employ some even quite crude input approximations-such as the use of statewide rather than specific emissions data for the systems. No significant differences between simulated and measured monthly means for any of the pollutants were noted on the basis of individual monthly analyses, though the results for NOx suggest the possible existence of some difference in that case. A more detailed statistical modeling using all monthly data in one combined analysis (allowing improved variability estimation) confirms these conclusions. Even the shorter confidence intervals for expected offsets obtained through the combined analysis show no significant differences between simulated and measured methods for SO2 and CO2. The differences for NOx are statistically significant but consistent-suggesting useful prediction by the simulations via a constant correction factor. As expected, significant differences between months are evident for both simulated and measured offsets.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
, , ,