Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10691385 | Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Our goal in this study was to evaluate the relevance of shear wave sonoelastography (SWE) in the differential diagnosis of masses in the breast with respect to ultrasound (US). US and SWE were performed (Aixplorer System, SuperSonic Imagine, Aix en Provence, France) in 76 women (aged 24 to 85) with 84 lesions (43 malignant, 41 benign). The study included BI-RADS-US (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System for Ultrsound) category 3-5 lesions. In elastograms, the following values were calculated: mean elasticity in lesions (Eav.l) and in fat tissue (Eav.f.) and maximal (Emax.adj.) and mean (Eav.adj.) elasticity in lesions and adjacent tissues. The sensitivity and specificity of the BI-RADS category 4a/4b cutoff value were 97.7% and 90.2%. For an Eav.adj. of 68.5 kPa, the cutoff sensitivity was 86.1% and the specificity was 87.8%, and for an Emax.adj. of 124.1 kPa, 74.4% and 92.7%, respectively. For BI-RADS-US category 3 lesions, Eav.l, Emax.adj. and Eav.adj. were below cutoff levels. On the basis of our findings, Eav.adj. had lower sensitivity and specificity compared with US. Emax.adj. improved the specificity of breast US with loss of sensitivity.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Authors
Katarzyna Dobruch-Sobczak, Andrzej Nowicki,